Abstracts, introductions and conclusions…

When writing an academic paper (or for that matter a dissertation or thesis) you must be careful to understand the roles of the units. For a detailed discussion see the post “How (not) to write an abstract“. I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments.

The essence? Abstracts are concise summaries for experts; introductions are for a wider audience.

Conclusions are more than just the “results”, it also answers the “so what?” question.

Unfortunately bad practice gets promoted by conferences first expecting an abstract and then weeks, sometimes months later expecting the full paper. When preparing a paper that way be careful, what you submit probably is closer to an introduction than an abstract.

Papers must report on research, but when you write an abstract first you may commit to a paper when results are not available.  How do you write a paper without having a “story” to tell? Only once you have your “story” figured out can you write a really good abstract, introduction and conclusion.


One Response to Abstracts, introductions and conclusions…

  1. Laurie says:

    Very nice link. Thanks. I must admit, I never really understood the difference.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: